Women and Computing

One of the never-ending subjects of Free Software is "Where are the Women?"

While I see it as mostly a non-problem -- that is, there are some obvious problems that need to be fixed with time, but no one is going to rectify them right now -- I'm doing what I can to encourage my daughters and son in the field.

In the meantime, The Decline of Women in Computer Science from 1940-1982 has some fascinating anecdotes:
Computing was unique, however, in the sense that the fledgling profession was still in its infancy and had no strong pre-war gender socialization.  This fact must have helped the women in that the returning men lacked programming expertise, and clearly had no expectation of “returning” to a programming job.  The lack of structure in the industry was also a boon to women programmers who wanted to continue working even after they became pregnant and had children.  Most notably, “Computations, Inc., of Harvard, Massachusetts (outside Route 128), formed in 1958 by Elsie Shutt and several other programmer-mothers who worked part-time and largely at home on problems contracted out to them by their former employers, such as Minneapolis-Honeywell and Raytheon”.  These women, widely known as the “Pregnant Programmers” were mentioned by speaker Richard H. Bolt at the M.I.T Symposium on American Women in Science and Engineering in 1964.  Bolt, who was a lecturer in Political Science at M.I.T and also a former Associate Director of the National Science Foundation (NSF) from 1960-1963, also mentioned the following:

 “I asked one of the unmarried women, a computer programmer in industry, if she thought a woman’s activities as a mother and homemaker would interfere with her opportunities in a career.  ‘One good thing about programming,’ she said, ‘is that you can work part time.’”

Comments

(Anonymous)

history

There are many reasons. I suggest we all try and investigating them. I didn't read the paper, but it doesn't look like the paper zeros in on them -- instead opting to characterize the problem in computing as one of society in general. Thus your reaction: "but no one is going to rectify them right now".

One example I saw recently was in the short synopsis of ENIAC in a book. The blurb didn't mention any of the people -- women -- who worked with on the project. This struck me as odd since histories of other computer projects often mention the men who worked on them. This "quiet revisionism" does a poor job of setting good examples for other women interested in computing.

Don't settle for the status que.

Re: history

"Don't settle for the status quo."

(Sorry, my inner gammarian coming out...)

I would suggest reading the paper before assuming what it says.

I'm not at all convinced that the status quo is wrong. Observing that the number of men and women in the free software world is very disproportionate does not automatically lead me to the conclusion that there is some injustice that needs to be corrected. I need more data.